We have compiled a list of manufacturers, distributors, product information, reference prices, and rankings for Removal evaluation experiment.
ipros is IPROS GMS IPROS One of the largest technical database sites in Japan that collects information on.

Removal evaluation experiment - List of Manufacturers, Suppliers, Companies and Products

Removal evaluation experiment Product List

1~1 item / All 1 items

Displayed results

Methods for the removal of hydrogen sulfide (H2S) gas and removal evaluation experiments.

Advantages and disadvantages of each hydrogen sulfide gas removal method.

There are various methods for removing hydrogen sulfide gas. In this instance, we conducted comparative experiments using (1) chemical adsorbent methods and (2) photocatalytic methods, which are commonly adopted for hydrogen sulfide gas countermeasures. We filled a 1m³ container with 3.4 ppm (3400 ppb) of gas and compared the removal performance of the chemical adsorbent method and the photocatalytic method. According to the data in the graph, it was found that the chemical adsorbent method sharply decreased the gas concentration compared to the photocatalytic method. While the photocatalytic method took about 120 seconds to reduce the concentration from 3.4 ppm to 0 ppm, the chemical adsorbent completed the removal in approximately 40 to 50 seconds. It can be concluded that by adopting a removal device using a chemical adsorbent, it is possible to minimize the time that electronic devices are exposed to hydrogen sulfide gas when it intrudes.

  • chemi_2.gif
  • filter

Added to bookmarks

Bookmarks list

Bookmark has been removed

Bookmarks list

You can't add any more bookmarks

By registering as a member, you can increase the number of bookmarks you can save and organize them with labels.

Free membership registration